Sorry for the hiccup at the beginning of the week, I hedged with 40% (short 20% on QQQ, short 20% IWM) at the open of Monday and covered the 20% hedge on QQQ 2 hours before Market close on Monday and lifted the rest of the shorts (20% IWM at the open) on Tuesday morning.
The Quads flipped on Monday morning, usually I wait for a week, but the thrust was too strong, so I took the risk to trusted that intraweek Quad push to 1-2.
My call last week was a “constructive Quad 3, still constructive" with a * that points to an environment where one should be alert but open for both outcomes (up or down).
Stuff like that happens, the hedge cost me about 1% performance, so nothing major.
One educational thing for me first:
Above you see a backtest from 3Fourteen @WarrenPies (Twitter), it shows that Quads work!
My Quad Buckets:
Consumer Staples: Quad 4 (Risk off)
Utilities: Quad 4 (Risk off)
Energy: Quad 2 and 3 (two if Tech is also leading, 3 if tech is not leading)
Industrials: Quad 1 (Risk on)
Consumer Discretionary: Quad 1 (Risk on)
Communication Services: Quad 1-2 (Risk on)
Tech Quad 1-2 (Risk on)
Real Estate (I only use the Builders): Quad 1-2
Basic Materials —> I have them in the constructive Quad 3 Bucket, e.g. if they are bullish and Oil and Dollar not, that is fine for the market!
Next week? Here is the picture:
The call is a Quad 2 with a *, e.g. I would not add risk here but look for spots to reduce risk and I am leaning to hedge!
Why:
Breadth is very weak!
Positioning still neutral to (too?) stretched:
Reactions to earnings is overall bad (not good at all!).
I went through all (bigger) earnings since Jan 05, 11 positive reactions, 31 (!) negative reactions.
Earnings season is a bullish time, but not if the market rallied massively before earnings season, in this case expectations are mostly too high.
Bitcoin’s potential news failure:
Bitcoin sensitive stocks show relative weakness to bitcoin:
I am still watching this video, but my notes tell me, that from around 17th of January a window of weakness in terms of flows start (and this already shows in breadth!):
Also I think the Fed will demonstrate a more hawkish rhetoric from here on because the market is up hard and Treasury will use the strong market to issue (reflexivity!).
My model is doing fine (but is selling more and more positions):
50% sell on VTSI:
SURG sold (everything):
ESEA Sell (all of it):
Look, we had a good run since the Quad 2 call on 11/3/2023.
Here is my game plan:
I will not add any risk here (I am long about 80% going into Monday)
I am leaning to hedge (I will notify) with a 40% short on IWM (so half of my longs will be covered by the short).
All right, have a great week.
All the best and best regards.
Andreas
The information on from Andreas Himmelreich / QuantStrike and this video / blog is for information and discussion purposes only. It does not constitute a recommendation to purchase or sell any financial instruments or other products. Investment decisions should not be made with this video / blog, and one should consider the investment objectives or financial situation of any person or institution.
Investors should obtain advice based on their own individual circumstances from their own tax, financial, legal and other advisers about the risks and merits of any transaction before making an investment decision, and only make such decisions based on the investor’s own objectives, experience, and resources.
The information from Andreas Himmelreich / QuantStrike and this video / blog is based on generally available and paid information and, although obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be assured, and such information may be incomplete or condensed. All performance results are hypothetical and the result of back testing only. Out-of-sample performance may be different. No claim is made about future performance.
Investments in financial instruments or other products carry significant risk, including the possible total loss of the principal amount invested. Andreas Himmelreich / QuantStrike and this video / blog do not purport to identify all the risks or material considerations which may be associated with entering any transaction. Andreas Himmelreich / QuantStrike and this video / blog accepts no liability for any loss (whether direct, indirect or consequential) that may arise from any use of the information contained in or derived from Andreas Himmelreich / QuantStrike and this video / blog.
Hello Andreas,
Thanks for sharing! Which is the time horizon you use to look at relative outperformance of constituents vs. SPY ETF in each quad section ? 1 week or more? Many thanks. I've programmed a Relative Price change, scaled by the volatility / ATR in the last 3-4 bars in TC2000 and use it for tracking which sectors outperform the SPY ETF on D1 and W1 timeframes. This gives an volatility/ATR adjusted move against the volatility adjusted move of the baseline / SPY ETF- so if the outcome for CIBR is 0.93 the interpretation would be that the move is positive and 0.93 ATRs stronger vs. the move in the baseline ticker, considering baseline move and volatility measured through ATR. Cheers.
Hello Andreas, I'm a new subscriber to QuantStrike, but a user of P123. You showed a strategy in your January 13th post with several stock sell signals on charts. I imagine the strategies are proprietary, but where can I learn more about them such as the investing styles they reflect and how to read some of the asset descriptions such as 10 Stock 1.0 dynamic? Also do you post Buy and Sell signals for one or more of these strategies each week? Thanks. Mike